I think these might just be the new cruisers that have been out lately, except they finally decided to market them differently. Supposedly the new packaging will be out this March, but they are giving them to Winter Olympians with kids.
http://thedirtytshirt.com/new-pampers-cruisers-with-dry-max-special-partnership
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
Cool on those, though I haven’t been able to fit in them in forever 
Dumb question for anyone.
Pretend for a moment that they made baby diapers with the exact same shape, girth and proportions, but bigger in size for adults….
Is it just me or would those be an wildly impractical diaper for adults, for the shape that is. I dunno, I just think that the adult body is so vastly different than an infants that an adult diaper shaped like a babies diaper wouldn’t fit right.
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
The Olympic symbol is going to get shit on. I don’t think that is sending the right message.
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
Really dude? That’s where you draw the line? Not the comic book hero underwear or the sesame street/disney character diapers, (which have probably shaped our culture far more than the olympics ever have), but 5 multicolored circles that only symbolize a worldwide series of competitions.
Hmm…I wonder if I should be using diapers with the letter M for Medium on them. Afterall, peeing on the letter M must send a bad message to 1/26th of our entire language.
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
Well, as long as you’re consistent…
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
The link you posted is not valid. I get a 403 forbidden error.
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
It was valid for the rest of us…
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
Weird, now it works. That site must have been down for maintenance at the time I tried. Or it was my ISP being stupid again. Either way, cool article.
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
I think that’s actually pretty legit. It’s a shame I don’t fit in them (I have a pack of Size 7 Cruisers at home which I discovered I’m just slightly too large for)
You could argue the same for Barney, Mickey Mouse, Big Bird, flowers, or any other design ever seen on a diaper….
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
…no, you can’t argue that.
The idea that a natural body function of turning food into waste is somehow a “negative” thing is idiotic. You might as well argue that making a cake with the olympic symbols for icing decoration also sends a bad message considering what that cake will eventually turn into after eaten.
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
That’s exactly my point!
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
You have a funny way of saying that, in fact what you said is almost the opposite of what you’re saying now.
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
I think you failed to understand the sarcasm of my original message.
He was saying shitting on the Olympics logo sent a negative message.
And then I said that would be the same thing as saying ANY design would send a negative message.
Here’s the mathematical proof to make it clear:
Does defecating on a diaper that has a certain design mean its giving that design a negative message? No.
The Olympics logo is a design on a diaper.
Therefore the Olympics logo on a diaper does not send a negative messsage.
Are we clear now?
If we’re not, I’ll put it in simpler terms: I was disagreeing with Victor by using a counter-argument!
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
Does defecating on a diaper that has a certain design mean its giving that design a negative message? No.
You did not say or even imply that.
If we’re not, I’ll put it in simpler terms: I was disagreeing with Victor by using a counter-argument!
It was not a counter argument, it was an addition to his argument.
Though, I’ll accept that you were trying to be sarcastic and just didn’t understand that your statement had absolutely no traces of sarcasm in it (I’m sorry dude but it really doesn’t).
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
Have you seriously never heard anyone say something that you disagreed with and then you respond, “Yeah, that would be like saying….”?
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
No no no, you misunderstand.
My point is that in the English language, especially on a place where Tone and mood are nonexistent, wording is -everything.-
You can say the same sentence a thousand different ways, and even though all the literal wording of the sentences can mean the same thing, they still have the potential to be different.
Example-
Really?
….Really.
Really….
Oh Really.
Oh Really?
O Rly?
Some are sarcastic, some aren’t. Yours, in the same light, was -not- sarcastic. Even your statement now, the “Yeah, that would be like saying….” part, that has a different meaning and probably would have been construed as sarcastic.
What you did say wasn’t sarcastic, and thus my reaction to it was as if you were being serious because it really does sound like you’re being serious.
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
ANYWAY
I haven’t been able to fit into a baby diaper since I was like 12. I think I still have a couple packages up in the guest room closet at my Mom’s. My girlfriend got me those Pampers Size 7 when they came out, but my skinny emo ass will barely fit into them.
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
Waist size?
Re: For those of you who still use baby diapers…
I wear 30/32 jeans.
But I think my waist is 28 inches around. Idk I gotta start gaining haha.