This article is interesting not only because a men’s website posted it, but because of the poll results: currently, the majority of people who’ve responded to the poll (as of this posting, a mere 160 people) say that the video in the article has a non-pornographic explanation. The video in question is an old, old, old diapergal video clip, and anyone familiar with diapergal knows that they produce diaper-related porn.
Re: Asylum.com asks: Girls in adult diapers - is it porn?
Yes its porn in the sense that it is designed to stimulate a sexual response in those of us who happen to have a diaper fetish. Frak that vid is old in terms of the internet is that Skymouse or diapergirls? The video is pornographic but I don’t find it at all arousing those diapergirl vids were boring. And if the judgment is that it isn’t porn why are there sites today and in the past that insist you pay pornography prices for it?
It always makes me laugh to read the comments about diapergirl videos in a non-fetishist context the guy saying such a sight would make a straight man gay is probably hiding something equally kinky in his closet.
But then its only sick and strange when its someone else’s kink.
Re: Asylum.com asks: Girls in adult diapers - is it porn?
So, if I set up a site called “cute shoes” and insist people pay pornography prices (whatever the heck THAT is supposed to be) to get in, that makes shoes pornographic?
For a membership in Netflix it costs about the same per month as one of those sites. Is Netflix pornographic?
I’m not saying you can’t make an argument for this being porn, but I am saying this particular argument is extremely weak.
You know what I mean the websites that come along every once and awhile that attempt to charge $25.99 for a 10 minute diaper video. I know the proper price is whatever people will pay but man……
And if you were starting a “cute shoes” website and intentionally going after the shoe/foot fetish market then yes it would also be pornographic. Although maybe they used the wrong word there instead of pornographic maybe they should have used the word erotic.
Re: Asylum.com asks: Girls in adult diapers - is it porn?
Dude…couple of things.
There’s a quote button right in between to the number button and the spoiler button, you should really use that or at least quotations (which you’ve aptly demonstrated you can use) when quoting someone else.
Two, you’ve demonstrated you can use certain forms of punctuation like quotations, periods and capitalization; I seriously recommend adding commas to that repertoire of grammar skills as it is very hard to read your posts without them.
Three, price has absolutely nothing to do with what is and isn’t pornographic and will never make something pornographic. It’s as Guinevere said, you could charge people 25.99 to view a cute shoes website and it wouldn’t be pornographic. Doesn’t matter what the host of the website’s intent is, it is not automatically pornographic or erotic.
Diapergal is a pornographic site due to its obvious sexual nature, not because of it’s price. There are several videos of women urinating in a diaper then masturbating in it, that’s basically sex-oriented right there. If price were a primary factor in what is and isn’t erotic, then buying a canvas of The Birth of Venus would be considered buying Pornography.
Re: Asylum.com asks: Girls in adult diapers - is it porn?
I have always been kind of a failure in the comma department, I would be the first to admit that. I don’t know what it is with me and grammar I hate to speak or spell incorrectly and hate the text-speak brb, IIRC and so on but I still look like fool when I try (or more often then not don’t try) to implement commas, colons or semi-colons. I know you are probably one of those types that thinks it denotes laziness and a lack of education but more often then not I am typing too quickly and forget. I’ll try not to make the quote button mistake again I see it now.
Re: Asylum.com asks: Girls in adult diapers - is it porn?
So that pisses you off? Dear lord, glad I wasn’t trying to piss you off intentionally. I thought the original comment was commentary by you on how lack of commas or punctuation in general can be seen especially in a medium without the benefit of verbal communication or facial expression. No offense was meant, sorry if it was given.
Re: Asylum.com asks: Girls in adult diapers - is it porn?
I think that video, as well as many other diaper videos, are what is referred to as “fetish fuel” on TVtropes.com. While not porn by the strictest definition, if it turns you on, it’s fetish fuel.
Re: Asylum.com asks: Girls in adult diapers - is it porn?
I’ve never understood what was wrong with the “I’ll know it when I see it” designation. I’ll grant it doesn’t help much when someone stands to be punished for something they did not intend as pornography but the judge does. However, on the internet which is theoretically irregulable and the worst someone stands is social ostracism - what’s wrong with simply agreeing to differ? If you stand to lose that much face, just argue. Anyone who’d ignore an honest opinion is enough of a dick that they oughtn’t matter.
It’s obviously enormously subjective even to a pretty sex-positive audience - shouldn’t the subjectivity define it? Like saying “this is porn for me,” “this is porn for him,” or something like that? Like the fetish fuel on tvtropes, it’s a subjective deal even to those who I should hope are our most objective world figures - the American Supreme Court.